Aayush Wellness Limited - Aayush Herbal Pan Masala
Recommendation: Upheld | Medium: Industry Member
The ASCI had approached the advertiser for its response in addressing the grievances of the complainant and forwarded
the details of the complaint, verbatim, to the advertiser with a request to respond to the same. The advertiser was offered
an option to seek an Informal Resolution (IR) of the complaint by modifying or withdrawing the claims in the
advertisement, or alternately to substantiate the claims with supporting data. The advertiser was also offered an
opportunity for a telecon with the ASCI Secretariat, which they did not avail and submitted their response.
The advertiser in their response stated that, “We request you enlighten us about the jurisdiction of ASCI to register and
adjudicate on any complaint against the Company including the relevant laws, rules which empower ASCI to act as a
judicial authority, enforceability of orders passed by ASCI and any appellate authority to challenge any orders passed
ASCI”.
The ASCI Secretariat responded to the advertiser’s query and requested them to substantiate the claims made. In the
absence of any support data, the advertiser was advised to withdraw the claims so that this complaint could be resolved
under IR mechanism. However, the advertiser did not respond within the given timelines.
The Consumer Complaints Council (CCC) viewed the Website advertisement (https://www.aayushwellness.com/pan-
masala), considered the complaint and the advertiser’s reply.
The CCC observed that the advertiser has not responded to the objections raised in the complaint. The advertiser has
sought for explanation of ASCI's legal powers - its ability to handle complaints, the laws that give it authority, and
whether its decisions are enforceable. The CCC further observed that the advertiser has not provided product specific
details such as copy of product label, product approval license, evidence of ingredients present in the product, and
product composition details.
The CCC discussed that the claims, “Supports Digestion & Reduces Inflammation*”, and “Supports immunity and
stamina*”, are qualified via disclaimer which says, “*based on key properties of the natural ingredients”. In the absence
of claim support data, the said claims were not substantiated with clinical evidence of product efficacy.
The claim, Clinically researched was not substantiated with clinical evidence of product efficacy and safety based on human trials.
The claims are misleading by exaggeration and are likely to lead to widespread disappointment in the minds of consumers. The source for the claims is not indicated in the advertisement. The claims contravened Chapter I, Clauses 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.5 of the ASCI Code, and ASCI Guidelines on Advertising of Foods & Beverages (F&B). This
complaint was UPHELD